# Rainbond vs rsyslog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Rainbond | rsyslog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 67/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in PaaS | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 6 284 ✓ | 2 344 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +8 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v6.10.0-release · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

rsyslog scores 67/100 against 64/100 for Rainbond, so it is the safer default.

Rainbond ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.

If you want the quickest setup, Rainbond is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.

rsyslog is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Rainbond](https://selfhost.directory/project/rainbond) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rainbond.md)
- [rsyslog](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rainbond-vs-rsyslog