# Radarr vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Radarr | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Download Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 14 671 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +240 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/radarr-vs-zammad