# Radarr vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Radarr | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Download Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 14 671 ✓ | 8 068 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +240 ✓ | +161 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/radarr-vs-woodpecker-ci