# Radarr vs Wildbox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Radarr | Wildbox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Download Management | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 14 672 ✓ | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +241 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+241 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)
- [Wildbox](https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/radarr-vs-wildbox