# Radarr vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Radarr | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Download Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 14 672 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +241 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | C | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+241 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/radarr-vs-uusec-waf