# Radarr vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Radarr | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Download Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 667 | 117 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +243 | +5 391 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 78/100 for Radarr, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/radarr-vs-tradingagents