# Radarr vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Radarr | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Download Management | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 14 671 ✓ | 1 370 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +240 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for tapflow.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/radarr-vs-tapflow