# Radarr vs speedtest-rust

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Radarr | speedtest-rust |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Download Management | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 671 ✓ | 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +240 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 45/100 for speedtest-rust, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for speedtest-rust.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; speedtest-rust needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)
- [speedtest-rust](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/radarr-vs-speedtest-rust