racktablesvsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| racktables | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 813 | 2 922 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +120 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 47/100 for racktables, so it is the safer default.
Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for racktables.
If you want the quickest setup, Zot Registry is easier to run; racktables needs more configuration.
Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).
racktables details →Zot Registry details →
Swap a project
Keep racktables, compare it with
Keep Zot Registry, compare it with