# racktables vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | racktables | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 813 | 35 798 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +837 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 47/100 for racktables, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for racktables.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; racktables needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+837 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [racktables](https://selfhost.directory/project/racktables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/racktables.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/racktables-vs-seaweedfs