racktablesvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| racktables | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 813 | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 28 |
| Latest release | — | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 47/100 for racktables, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for racktables.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; racktables needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).
racktables details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep racktables, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with