# rackpad vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rackpad | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 34 in Network Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 424 | 93 060 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 266 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.8.6 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 53/100 for rackpad, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for rackpad.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; rackpad needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 266 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rackpad](https://selfhost.directory/project/rackpad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rackpad.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rackpad-vs-uptime-kuma