# RabbitMQ vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RabbitMQ | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rabbitmq-vs-zookeeper