# RabbitMQ vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RabbitMQ | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 | 53 714 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +329 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 77/100 for RabbitMQ, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rabbitmq-vs-windowsindocker