RabbitMQvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RabbitMQ | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).
RabbitMQ details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with