# RabbitMQ vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RabbitMQ | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.

RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rabbitmq-vs-wbo