# RabbitMQ vs verdaccio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RabbitMQ | verdaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 950 | 17 956 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 ✓ | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 76/100 for verdaccio, so it is the safer default.

verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for RabbitMQ.

If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.

## Details

- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)
- [verdaccio](https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rabbitmq-vs-verdaccio