# RabbitMQ vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RabbitMQ | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.

RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rabbitmq-vs-upptime