RabbitMQvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RabbitMQ | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 | 39 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 13 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 77/100 for RabbitMQ, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).
RabbitMQ details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with