# RabbitMQ vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RabbitMQ | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 13 950 | 118 160 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +5 801 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 77/100 for RabbitMQ, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 801 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rabbitmq-vs-tradingagents