# RabbitMQ vs Thingport

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RabbitMQ | Thingport |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #14 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 ✓ | 233 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | extension-latest · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 49/100 for Thingport, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Thingport.

RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)
- [Thingport](https://selfhost.directory/project/thingport) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/thingport.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rabbitmq-vs-thingport