# RabbitMQ vs Super Productivity

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RabbitMQ | Super Productivity |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 950 | 23 256 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +1 016 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 77/100 for RabbitMQ, so it is the safer default.

Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for RabbitMQ.

If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.

Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 016 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)
- [Super Productivity](https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rabbitmq-vs-super-productivity