RabbitMQvsSpoolman
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RabbitMQ | Spoolman | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 | 2 955 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 7 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.27.0 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 65/100 for Spoolman, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Spoolman.
If you want the quickest setup, Spoolman is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.
RabbitMQ details →Spoolman details →
Swap a project
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with
Keep Spoolman, compare it with