RabbitMQvsSketchForge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RabbitMQ | SketchForge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #9 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 | 1 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 3 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.0.3 · 17 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 55/100 for SketchForge, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for SketchForge.
If you want the quickest setup, SketchForge is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.
RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).
RabbitMQ details →SketchForge details →
Swap a project
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with
Keep SketchForge, compare it with