# RabbitMQ vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RabbitMQ | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for RabbitMQ.

If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rabbitmq-vs-rudderstack