RabbitMQvsrudder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RabbitMQ | rudder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #4 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 950 | 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | 9.1.4 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Scala |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 55/100 for rudder, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for rudder.
If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; rudder needs more configuration.
RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).
RabbitMQ details →rudder details →
Swap a project
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with
Keep rudder, compare it with