# R2R vs Vert

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | R2R | Vert |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in RAG | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 8 049 | 16 175 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +542 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Vert scores 71/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; R2R needs more configuration.

Vert is growing faster right now (+542 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)
- [Vert](https://selfhost.directory/project/vert) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vert.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/r2r-vs-vert