# R2R vs Vane

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | R2R | Vane |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in RAG | #4 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 8 047 | 37 819 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +916 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.2 · 10 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Vane scores 81/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

Vane ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.

If you want the quickest setup, Vane is easier to run; R2R needs more configuration.

Vane is growing faster right now (+916 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)
- [Vane](https://selfhost.directory/project/vane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vane.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/r2r-vs-vane