# R2R vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | R2R | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in RAG | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 8 047 | 117 967 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 608 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/r2r-vs-tradingagents