R2RvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| R2R | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in RAG | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 8 047 | 117 928 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 569 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).
R2R details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep R2R, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with