# QGIS Web Client vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | QGIS Web Client | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Maps | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 383 | 95 336 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 374 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 374 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qwc2-vs-stirling-pdf