# QGIS Web Client vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | QGIS Web Client | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Maps | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 383 | 29 392 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +113 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qwc2-vs-srs