# quik vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | quik | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #23 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 193 | 24 059 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +781 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 39/100 for quik, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for quik.

If you want the quickest setup, quik is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+781 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [quik](https://selfhost.directory/project/quik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quik.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/quik-vs-temporal