quivssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qui | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 45 in Download Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 731 | 114 285 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +177 | +3 537 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.33.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 70/100 for qui, so it is the safer default.
qui ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, qui is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 537 stars in 30 days).
qui details →supabase details →