QuestarrvsTwenty
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Questarr | Twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #38 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 703 | 60 020 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 632 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Twenty scores 84/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
Twenty ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.
Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 632 stars in 30 days).
Questarr details →Twenty details →
Swap a project
Keep Questarr, compare it with
Keep Twenty, compare it with