QuestarrvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Questarr | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #39 of 118 in Media Server | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 703 | 47 726 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+19 stars in 30 days).
Questarr details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Questarr, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with