# Questarr vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Questarr | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #39 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 703 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.

Questarr ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Questarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/questarr-vs-sdnext