QuestarrvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Questarr | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #39 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 703 | 45 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 639 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 35 |
| Latest release | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).
Questarr details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Questarr, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with