# quassel-webserver vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | quassel-webserver | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #79 of 110 in Chat | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 211 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Less | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 43/100 for quassel-webserver, so it is the safer default.

sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [quassel-webserver](https://selfhost.directory/project/quassel-webserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quassel-webserver.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/quassel-webserver-vs-sdnext