# quackback vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | quackback | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 14 in Customer Support | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 332 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.

quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; quackback needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/quackback-vs-wbo