# quackback vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | quackback | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 78 732 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 008 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.

quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 008 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/quackback-vs-unsloth