# quackback vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | quackback | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 11 045 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

unopim scores 69/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.

unopim is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/quackback-vs-unopim