# quackback vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | quackback | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 45 030 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 629 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/quackback-vs-reactive-resume