# Qtap vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Qtap | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 6 519 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

Zabbix is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qtap-vs-zabbix