# Qtap vs ToolJet

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Qtap | ToolJet |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 41 141 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +154 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 76 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | HTML |

## Which one should you pick?

ToolJet scores 77/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.

If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.

ToolJet is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)
- [ToolJet](https://selfhost.directory/project/tooljet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tooljet.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qtap-vs-tooljet