# Qtap vs Tailscale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Qtap | Tailscale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 38 249 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 444 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Tailscale scores 84/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.

If you want the quickest setup, Tailscale is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.

Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 444 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)
- [Tailscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qtap-vs-tailscale