# Qtap vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Qtap | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 29 391 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +112 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qtap-vs-srs