# Qtap vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Qtap | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 38 967 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 355 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 355 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qtap-vs-searxng