# QMReader vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | QMReader | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 261 | 60 029 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 571 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.

QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Twenty.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 571 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [QMReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qmreader-vs-twenty