# qm-music vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-wbo